PHIL 311 SUNY Morrisville Medical Negligence in Healthcare Essay

Essay 3 Prompt & Final Portfolio Assembly Instructions Professional Ethics Fall 2020Essay 3 Topic: How do the arguments you made about professional ethical responsibility(essay 1) and ethical theory (essay 2) apply to a profession-specific case study?For your third essay, you should present a RESEARCHED scenario that presents an ethicalproblem to a professional in your area1– provide research into that professional topic, includingsourced justification for why that topic has real world ethical relevance to the profession. Makesure you introduce your research, as well – if you have consulted an expert in the field, introducethat expert in the body of the paper, including their expertise (what their job is, how long theyhave worked at it). In terms of research, you should first consider primary investigation, whichinvolves interviewing someone who has experience working in your field (ideally not someonewho works at the college, but rather who is currently employed in the field). This interview canserve as evidence for your ethical issue, and represents the kind of valuable research you can do(see tips for doing interviews over email at the end of this document). Other options includesecondary research related to reported cases or incidents that can be found in journal articles,newspaper articles, or other forms of vetted reporting.After establishing what the case involves and why it is professionally relevant (section 1), youshould then argue the appropriate way to ethically act in the particular case. In order to do that,you need to, at minimum, do the following:Section 2: Present your interpretation of what you think the profession would considerthe ethical action, making explicit reference to the arguments you made in essay 1 (related toexpertise, interpretation, and your code of ethics);Section 3: Apply the ethical theory you explained and argued for in essay 2 to the casestudy, and determine what the theory would conclude is the ethical outcome or action(importantly, while you don’t need to re-explain the theory, you need to SHOW the reasoningconsistent with the theory and support your conclusion);Section 4: Offer your own thoughts on the above two conclusions – do they both lead tothe same outcome? If not, explain. Would you act according to those conclusions? Why or whynot? Consider issues related to agency in bureaucracies, integrity, or whistleblowing.Remember, YOU ARE ARGUING – make clear, consistent, and accurate claims, and supportthose claims through quoted reference to the relevant texts.Paper Specifications:• Follow APA formatting (for heading, spacing, margins, page numbers, etc.)• Provide in-text citations and a references page.• Should be 4-6 double-spaced, type-written pages (excluding reference and title page