Recall,your class project is the development of a 10-12-page, double-spaced(page limits are suggestions – your plan may be longer) marketing plancentered on a very important product – YOU. There were personalmarketing plan exercises at the conclusion of each chapter homeworkassignment that will aid in putting together content for thissemester-long project. You are to integrate your responses to themarketing plan exercises (along with other material of your choosing)into a compelling personal marketing plan document. This document willdetail your current personal and professional goals and aid you indeveloping a roadmap that will help you to achieve them. Please notethat the finished personal marketing plan should be more than simply astitching together of these end-of-chapter exercises. Also – propersentence structure and grammar will be a factor in grading. Your finalproject should be professional, which means you need to do a carefulproof edit prior to submission.

You should review the rubric (see below) for additional details … and be sure to include an updated resume as Appendix A.You should have 1 section in your plan for EACH of the grading rubriccategories – and please note that some categories have subheadings.Review the rubric first and make sure you follow that to set up yourpaper. You will also need to add an APA formatted title page to yourplan and save as a PDF to submit. If you cannot figure out how tointegrate your resume in the document prior to saving as a PDF, I willaccept it as a separate PDF, uploaded to the dropbox area. Be sure toreview the rubric before starting your paper!

I’m working on a business law discussion question and need support to help me learn.

YOU BE THE JUDGEWRITING PROBLEM John and Susan Verba sold a Vermont lakeshore lot to Shane and Deborah Rancourt for $115,000. The Ran-courts intended to build a house on the property, but after preparing the land for construction, they learned that a wetland protection law prevented building near the lake. They sued, seeking rescission of the contract. The trial court concluded that the parties had reached their agreement under a “mutual, but innocent, mis-understanding.” The trial judge gave the Verbas a choice: they could rescind the contract and refund the purchase price, or they could give the Rancourts $55,000, the difference between the sales price and the actual market value of the land. The Rancourts appealed. Were the Rancourts entitled to rescission of the contract? Argument for the Rancourts: When the parties have made a mutual mistake about an important factual issue, either party is entitled to rescind the contract. The land is of no use to us and we want our money back. Argument for the Verbas: Both sides were acting in good faith and both sides made an honest mistake. We are willing to acknowledge that the land is worth somewhat less than we all thought, and we are willing to refund $55,000. The buyers shouldn’t complain—they are getting the property at about half the original price, and the error was as much their fault as ours.

Only one page. explain the issue, analyze it and be the judge.

Tough Conversations

Imagine you are the HR manager at a company, and a female employee came to you upset because she felt a male coworker was creating a hostile work environment by repeatedly asking her out on dates even after she said “no.” What would you do?

Write a plan for how you would approach your conversation with each employee, including the most essential topics to cover. As you write your plan, think about what your goals are for this situation and how each conversation will help you achieve those goals.

Write a 2–3 page paper in which you:

• Write a plan for the conversation you would have with the employee, based on the concepts found in your textbook. What are the most important points you would need to cover in this conversation, and why?
• Write a plan for the conversation you would have with the employee’s male co-worker, based on the concepts found in your textbook. What are the most important points you would need to cover in this conversation, and why?
• Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements:
  • This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards. For assistance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course.
  • Include at least one reference to support your paper.

The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:

• Create a plan for approaching tough conversations with employees, including a rationale for the most essential topics to cover.

Watch the video below to help you with your Week 3 Assignment 1:

Assignment Question(s): 

Q1. State the reasons for allocating support department costs to the operating department. What are its various methods? Provide numerical examples of any two methods and discuss how these methods could be used to allocate these costs?(CH 8)

Answer:

Q2. Z&C has two support departments, A1 and A2, and two operating departments, B1 and B2. Z&C has decided to use the direct method and allocate variable A1 dept. costs based on the number of transactions and fixed A1 dept. costs based on the number of employees. A2 dept. variable costs will be allocated based on the number of service requests and fixed costs will be allocated based on the number of computers.The following information is provided:(CH 8)

    

Support   Departments

Operating   Departments

   

A1

A2

B1

B2

 

Total Department   variable costs

5,000

6,000

38,000

21,000

 

Total department   fixed costs

5,800

11,000

42,000

18,000

 

Number of   transactions

15

18

80

45

 

Number of   employees

5

7

15

12

 

Number of   service requests

12

7

15

10

 

Number of   computers

6

8

10

12

Allocate variable and fixed costs.

Answer:

Q3.JTC Corporation is a metal product manufacturer that produces three products: A, B, and C. The joint costs of the three products in 2018 were SAR 50,000. The total number of units for each product and the selling price per unit are given below: (CH 9)

  

Product

Units

Selling Price per unit

 

A

20,000

SAR 6

 

B

12,500

SAR 5

 

C

7,500

SAR 4

Using the physical volume method and sales value at the split-off method, allocate the joint costs to each product.

Answer:

Q4. ABC Ltd. is preparing a budget for 2018. Following are the information related to budget preparation:(CH 10)

Budgeted selling price per unit = SAR 200 per unit

Total fixed costs = SAR 250,000

Variable costs = SAR 65 per unit

Required:

Prepare flexible budget for 2,000, 2,500, 3,000 and 3,500 units. 

Answer:

You will analyze a text related to hate

Needs Heuristic Value and Quality of Expression

1. Purpose of the persuasive analysis. This is what you want to accomplish in your analysis.

2. A general description of your persuasive text. This description should provide the reader with an understanding of the text and the social significance of the text (and your work). Some of you may have a more specific and concrete text than others but everyone should have a text that centers your analysis.

3. Your description of the theoretical lens that you use to understand and critique your Web Page/film. You should define the theoretical concepts you use to understand your Web Page/film. For example, if you are examining a website maintained by a hate group in terms of its narrative features, then you will want to describe the “narrative” concept so that a reader will know what you “considered” as a narrative. Other optional theoretical concepts might include (heuristics, hate stratagem, or basic themes that are part of a thematic analysis).

4. Analysis: This would include the critique of your Web Page/film. For example, if you are analyzing an advertisement’s use of persuasive heuristics, then this portion of your paper would provide concrete and specific descriptions of the author’s attempts to encourage the heuristic processing of persuasive information.

5. Conclusions: This should include a discussion of what you have learned from your analysis. This might also include a brief discussion of the practical use of your findings.