For your final paper, you will research and analyze the advantages and disadvantages of international trade or globalization that have positively or negatively impacted the economy of a country or region of your choosing. These positive or negative impacts can be from the past or present. 

Your paper should include the following: 

• An introduction in which you describe a country’s or region’s international trade patterns with one or many of its important trade partners. You must use statistical data and factual information to address this question. 
• Integrate at least two economic concepts from the course (e.g., tariffs, supply and demand, externalities, the gains of trade and comparative advantage, common resources, monopolies and oligopolies) in your responses to the following bullet points. Use graphs, charts, equations, and so on to relate the theories that you choose. 
• Explain at least two specific positive impacts of international trade or of globalization on the country or region that you chose. 
• Explain at least two specific negative impacts of international trade or of globalization on the country or region that you chose. 
• Identify at least two groups that were particularly affected by international trade or by globalization (e.g., international businesses, domestic businesses, the domestic consumer, the domestic economy, workers in a particular industry). Explain how these groups were positively or negatively impacted. Consider the ethical and social implications of various aspects of the economy in your response. 
• Propose a detailed policy recommendation that you believe would help to mitigate the adverse impacts or enhance the positive impacts of trade or globalization on the country or region that you chose. 

Q.1. Critical Thinking: Financial System: Saving and Investment: Chapter 13: (4 Points)

Suppose the government borrows $20 billion more next year than this year.

a. Use a supply-and-demand diagram to analyze this policy. Does the interest rate rise or fall?

b. What happens to investment, private saving, public saving, and national saving? Compare the size of the changes to the $20 billion of extra government borrowing.

c. How does the elasticity of supply of loanable funds affect the size of these changes?

d. How does the elasticity of demand for loanable funds affect the size of these changes?

e. Suppose households believe that greater government borrowing today implies higher taxes to pay off the government debt in the future. What does this belief do to private saving and the supply of loanable funds today? Does it increase or decrease the affects you discussed in parts (a) and (b)?

Important Note: – Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from the textbook and at least two scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles.

Q.2. Critical Thinking: Financial System: The Basic Tools of Finance: Chapter 14: (3 Points)

When company executives buy and sell stock based on private information they obtain as part of their jobs, they are engaged in insider trading. 

a. Give an example of inside information that might be useful for buying or selling stock. 

b. Those who trade stocks based on inside information usually earn very high rates of return. Does this fact violate the efficient markets hypothesis? 

c. Insider trading is illegal. Why do you suppose that is?

This paper is designed to allow students to study and evaluatepossible remedies to the problems caused by inequality.

Papers should be 7-10 pages long, in 12 point type with 1.5 line spaces. All papers must include a bibliography using no less than 5 sources. These sources should be economics journal articles, and scholarly books. Wikipedia may be used for background information, but may not be included among the 5 sources.

My topic is:

11) Tax Havens and Tax Evasion: Revelations from the “Panama Papers” and “Pandora Papers” have put a spotlight on the use of shell companies, wealth management services and tax havens to avoid taxation. Efforts to freeze or seize the assets of Russian oligarchs also point in the same direction: wealth inequality has been increased by well-organized evasion strategies. Analyze what can be done to limit tax evasion through tax havens and other means. Look at recent efforts to strengthen information disclosure and enforcement, including the OECD’s Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Sharing https://www.oecd.org/tax/beps/beps-actions/ as well as https://www.oecd.org/naec/events/understanding-the-economy/the-hidden-wealth-of-nations-the-scourge-of-tax-havens.htm. You can also examine the work of the US Department of Treasury’s FinCen and their use of Geographic Targeting Orders to find the true owners of real estate bought in cash by shell companies, discussed in https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-impact-of-beneficial-ownership-transparency-on-illicit-purchases-of-us-property/. Also, watch the 2019 film “The Laundromat” and read Brooke Harrington, Capital Without Borders, ch 5 Wealth Management and Inequality

There is my outline attached, please start writing your paper based on this outline.

I think the regression you ran is an excellent start. You have a large number of countries and show a statistically significant impact of CKD rate on GDP. I would like you to expand this regression to a multivariate regression by including 3-4 “control variables”. These would be variables that you think may have an impact on GDP but are not related to the CKD rate. I’m thinking of things like the unemployment rate, inflation rate, income distribution, etc. You may find that not all countries have that data. As long as you have 30 countries your sample size is large enough for the purpose of this paper.

Once you do that, we should talk a little bit about how you would incorporate your findings into your paper. Essentially, you would keep your introduction and literature review, write up the results of your regression, and write a conclusion. That going to be better formula use with all recommendation from the Prof.

I know that this has been a lot of work for you and over a long period of time. However, I also feel that we are finally making some progress as you’ve gathered some data and shown that you can run the regression. Add 3-4 control variables, produce another regression output and we are almost there. Base on this recommendation of the Prof .I need a spreadsheet with all in one and good conclusion explanations of it.

I’m working on a economics discussion question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

Please tell us about a time when you took the cost of your time into consideration when you were making a decision. This could include a decision on whether or not to do something, how much to charge for something, how much you were willing to pay for something, etc. Please take the time to come up with a good example.

Example: I paid $100 to sign my son up for surf camp. The camp is on Mondays and Wednesdays from 3- 6 and is a 30-minute drive from our house. I was happily taking him each week until his grades started to fall. I told him that I wasn’t going to take him until he got his grades back up.

His response, “You should take me because you already paid for it.”

My response, “The money I spent on camp is gone (it’s a sunk cost) whether you go or not, but the time is not. You need to spend the four hours on your schoolwork instead of surfing until you get caught up. “

In this example, my son was only thinking about the explicit cost of the camp, not his (or my) implicit cost. He failed to realize that all the time he spent surfing (and being exhausted after) had a high cost in terms of his grades.