CNU Week 2 Should We Get Rid of Performance Reviews Discussion

Description

Should We Get Rid of Performance Reviews?

The attached is a very provocative article from the Wall Street Journal, Human Resources, “Get Rid of the Performance Review”, on the value (or not!) of performance reviews.

The article presents a point of view from the author, Samuel A. Cuthbert, who has obviously had some bad experiences! He also goes on to present an alternative approach to the traditional performance review.

  1. Read the article.
  2. Given what you have learned this week about performance review, their function, purpose and value from a legal standpoint: state your opinion on whether or not we should continue to utilize performance reviews in health care.
  3. State the reasons for your opinion and share any recommendations you have to either improve reviews or how you would recommend replacing them.
  4. Cite at least one additional reference to back up your opinion.

https://nationalu.brightspace.com/content/enforced/27677-HCA628-25134-2204/Get%20Rid%20of%20the%20Performance%20Review.pdf

Click on the forum and then select the Create Thread button to write your response. After you are finished answering the question, click on the Submit button located at the top right-hand corner of the page.

  • Read each question — there may be more than one.
  • Post your responses in the appropriate threads. Students are required to make their initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. (Pacific Time Zone).
  • Responses should be at least 200 words or more. You must research answers and all answers must include reading citations, with page numbers, parenthetical style (Author, Date: page#), and the source listed APA style at the end of the post.
  • Respond to at least two of your classmates’ postings. Responses should be at least 100 words or more. Responses are due by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. (your time zone).
  • Review your postings to see who has responded to you.
  • Be sure to answer ALL QUESTIONS.

Best approach: Just “talk ” to your fellow students. Have a conversation. If you do not count how many times you connect with your fellow students, you will give more than adequate responses. Prompt discussion, not make a simple comment, such as “good work!” There will be no credit for such responses that end rather than foster discussion. Address fellow students with respect and acceptance that there may be a variety of personal views.

Liver and onions

  1. Read the article.
  2. Given what you have learned this week about performance review, their function, purpose and value from a legal standpoint: state your opinion on whether or not we should continue to utilize performance reviews in health care.
  3. State the reasons for your opinion and share any recommendations you have to either improve reviews or how you would recommend replacing them.
  4. Cite at least one additional reference to back up your opinion.

https://nationalu.brightspace.com/content/enforced/27677-HCA628-25134-2204/Get%20Rid%20of%20the%20Performance%20Review.pdf

Click on the forum and then select the Create Thread button to write your response. After you are finished answering the question, click on the Submit button located at the top right-hand corner of the page.

  • Read each question — there may be more than one.
  • Post your responses in the appropriate threads. Students are required to make their initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. (Pacific Time Zone).
  • Responses should be at least 200 words or more. You must research answers and all answers must include reading citations, with page numbers, parenthetical style (Author, Date: page#), and the source listed APA style at the end of the post.
  • Respond to at least two of your classmates’ postings. Responses should be at least 100 words or more. Responses are due by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. (your time zone).
  • Review your postings to see who has responded to you.
  • Be sure to answer ALL QUESTIONS.

Best approach: Just “talk ” to your fellow students. Have a conversation. If you do not count how many times you connect with your fellow students, you will give more than adequate responses. Prompt discussion, not make a simple comment, such as “good work!” There will be no credit for such responses that end rather than foster discussion. Address fellow students with respect and acceptance that there may be a variety of personal views.

Miami Dade College Week 6 Belmont Report and Ethical Principles Discussion Response

Description

Refrences

1- The Belmont Report was written to respond to the infamous Tuskegee Syphilis Study whereby African Americans with syphilis were lied to and were consequently denied treatment for 40 years. Consequently, many of them died, infected others with the disease, and passed congenital syphilis to their kids (Adashi, Walters & Menikoff, 2018). The report, therefore, marks a crucial milestone in the history of clinical research since it establishes guidelines for basic ethical principles, as well as the concept of informed consent, and the assessment of benefits and risks to the subject selection process. Following the Tuskegee study, Congress acted accordingly and passed the National Research Act which created a commission for the protection of human subjects who are involved in behavioral and biomedical research. The Belmont Report, therefore, outlines the three key ethical principles that were concluded by the commission to guide research involving humans (Adashi, Walters & Menikoff, 2018).

One of the basic ethical principles from the Belmont Report is respect for persons. The Belmont Report states that respect for persons comprises of at least two ethical convictions. The first conviction is that individuals must be treated as autonomous agents, and secondly, that persons who have diminished autonomy are entitled to protection (Adashi, Walters & Menikoff, 2018). As such, this principle divides into two moral requirements when conducting research involving humans: the requirement that researchers should respect the autonomy and the requirement that those with diminished autonomy should be protected. Additionally, the report goes on to describe the autonomous person as the individual who is capable of deliberating about personal goals and then acting under the direction of the established deliberation. The people involved in the research must therefore be allowed to make choices, develop opinions, and act they want to (Adashi, Walters & Menikoff, 2018).

2- Respect of persons, beneficence, and justice are three basic principles that the Belmont Report talk about, these are particularly relevant to research that involves human subjects. Prior to the current era, disease removes people from the community of equals, diminishes their autonomy, and obligated physicians to take responsibility for the treatments that they provided (Cassell, 2000). This meant that when a human needed to go to the hospital, because of a disease or sickness, people where not considered human beings, now they were just a person that could be harmed and even wronged. To the point where physician withheld information and even lied to the patients about their condition.

This began to disappear as times progressed, and today thanks to the Belmont Report we have the principle of Respect for Person. This principle has two ethical beliefs. The first one is the right to autonomy for individuals, the second one is the right to protection for individuals with diminished autonomy. This means that each person or human being has the right to choose and make decision on their own, and that people with any kind of disability will be protected. This principle reaches to the core of humanity, because it gives the person the autonomy to make decisions for themselves, and protection for those who cannot make decisions. This is a beautiful principle, it is pure freedom.

3-The Belmont Report birthed the three ethical principles that the commission concluded in human research. Among the principles is justice. According to Adashi et al. (2018), with this principle, all the human subjects in research should be treated equally during the study and the research recruitment stage. In this respect, the subjects should not be selected based on a preexisting model of selection, including on race, ethnicity, or tribe. This is important in giving an equal platform for all the clinical participants to participate in the study.

In some cases, the investigators could apply biased grounds when selecting research subjects. For instance, during clinical trials, all people of all social classes should be represented and equally treated without bias. This should form the primary ethical framework for all researchers today and in the future.

FNU Advanced Pathophysiology Integumentary Function Paper

Description

Integumentary Function: 

Please note, I need the cases 1 and 2 and also I need 2 peer responses!!! It can be any additional comment or adding additional information about the same topic. The peer responses can be short answers, just a comment or adding additional information about the same topic.

Please name each question!!!! Do not use question #, find the attachment as an example

K.B. is a 40-year-old white female with a 5-year history of psoriasis. She has scheduled an appointment with her dermatologist due to another relapse of psoriasis. This is her third flare-up since a definitive diagnosis was made. This outbreak of plaque psoriasis is generalized and involves large regions on the arms, legs, elbows, knees, abdomen, scalp, and groin. K.B. was diagnosed with limited plaque-type psoriasis at age 35 and initially responded well to topical treatment with high-potency corticosteroids. She has been in remission for 18 months. Until now, lesions have been confined to small regions on the elbows and lower legs.

Case Study Questions

  1. Name the most common triggers for psoriasis and explain the different clinical types.
  2. There are several types of treatments for psoriasis, explain the different types and indicate which would be the most appropriate approach to treat this relapse episode for K.B. Also include non-pharmacological options and recommendations.
  3. Included in question 2
  4. A medication review and reconciliation are always important in all patient, describe and specify why in this particular case is important to know what medications the patient is taking?
  5. What others manifestation could present a patient with Psoriasis?

Sensory Function:
C.J. is a 27-year-old male who started to present crusty and yellowish discharged on his eyes 24 hours ago. At the beginning he thought that washing his eyes vigorously the discharge will go away but by the contrary increased producing a blurry vision specially in the morning. Once he clears his eyes of the sticky discharge her visual acuity was normal again. Also, he has been feeling throbbing pain on his left ear. His eyes became red today, so he decided to consult to get evaluated. On his physical assessment you found a yellowish discharge and bilateral conjunctival erythema. His throat and lungs are normal, his left ear canal is within normal limits, but the tympanic membrane is opaque, bulging and red.

Case Study Questions

  1. Based on the clinical manifestations presented on the case above, which would be your eyes diagnosis for C.J. Please name why you get to this diagnosis and document your rational.
  2. With no further information would you be able to name the probable etiology of the eye affection presented? Viral, bacterial, allergic, gonococcal, trachoma. Why and why not.
  3. Based on your answer to the previous question regarding the etiology of the eye affection, which would be the best therapeutic approach to C.J problem.

Submission Instructions:

  • You must complete both case studies.
  • Your initial post should be at least 500 words per case study, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.
  • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.) 
  • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.
  • Resources
    Textbook(s)
    · Delugash, L., Story, L. (2020). Applied Pathophysiology for the Advanced Practice
    Nurse. Burlington, MA: Jones and Bartlett Learning. ISBN: 978-1284150452
    · American Psychological Association. (2019). Publication manual of the American
    Psychological Association (7th ed.). ISBN: 9781433832154
    Recommended
    · McCance, C. K., Huether, E. S., Brashers, L. V., & Rote, S. N. (2019). Pathophysiology:
    The biologic basis for disease in adult and children (8th ed). Elsevier. ISBN:
    9780323413176
    · Maria T. Codina Leik N-C, A. (2017). Family nurse practitioner certification intensive
    review: Fast facts and practice questions (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing Company
    · Fitzgerald, A. M. (2017). Nurse Practitioner Certification Examination and Practice
    Preparation. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis Company. ISBN: 978-0803660427
    · Barkley, T. W., Jr. (2021). Family nurse practitioner certification review/clinical
    update continuing education course. Barkley & Associates, Inc.
  • null

NR 506 University of Kentucky Nursing Achievement of Developments Discussion

Description

Requirements:

Berwick, D., Snair, M., & Nishtar, S. (2018). Crossing the global health care quality chasm: A key component of universal health coverage. Journal of American Medical Association, 320(13), 1317-1318. 

Read the Berwick article and reflect on the concepts and practices you have learned in NR506 on healthcare systems, politics, and health policy. Reflections should include: 

How to make informed decisions on nursing practice and patient outcomes on a global basis.? In addition, state how you will apply what you have learned in this course to your upcoming practicum experience.?  

Describe how one will apply content from NR506NP to the upcoming clinical courses. 

Peer 1:

Jalanni GiddingsApr 18, 2022 11:44 PMHello Professor & Classmates,ReflectionsMaking an informed decision in nursing practice greatly influences patient outcomes. There are many complex factors that influences our decision-making process. Nursing decision-making involves a comprehensive approach involving research, education, experience and practice.  Evidence-based practice is one method through which nurses can make well-informed decisions. According to Berwick et al. (2018) , a system approach is one way to render informed judgments. When implementing this strategy, it is important to keep in mind that the systems as a whole must be in sync in order to fulfill the goals. The article suggests that global health care should reflect the ideals of society. As an APN, I intend to employ a multifaceted approach to patient care, drawing on my clinical skills as well as evidence-based research. To make informed decisions, there is a need to rely on the evidence acquired through research and scientific evaluation practice. Understanding the needs of my patients is critical and it will help me identify patterns pertinent to my informed decision-making process.With the knowledge gained from NR506NP, I hope to successfully navigate my way through my upcoming clinical courses by staying current on the latest research and healthcare policies. Through this course, I’ve gained a better understanding of how essential healthcare policy is to nursing practice, as well as how critical it is for me to be involved in the development and implementation of these policies.  As a future APN, I aspire to make an impact on quality patient care and community health. This course has shown me how important it is to participate in shaping and promoting health policy.ReferenceBerwick, D., Snair, M., & Nishtar, S. (2018). Crossing the global health care quality chasm: A key component of universal health coverage. Journal of American Medical Association, 320(13), 1317-1318. -Jalanni Gidding

Peer 2:

Jennifer MaynorApr 19, 2022 2:50 AMProfessor and classmates,The Institute of Medicine has noted that up to 98,000 patients die each year due to poor decision-making in healthcare (Nibbelink &Brewer, 2018). Nurse Practitioners assess and treat many people a day and have to make decisions and triage quickly due to time constraints volume of patients in the waiting room. Therefore, we need to improve our decision-making. We rely on our experience, intuition, and context of the patient’s assessment. In order to make informed decisions sometimes, we need to collaborate with other providers for the care of the patient and improve patient outcomes.The class has taught me the order in pursuing change and policy and the professional way to do it. The legislature and our state representatives will listen more and advocating for change does not have to be a tedious process but is a necessary one. Leadership is essential to hone and work on as this can make or break a practice. Communication is crucial to maintain with staff, patients, and other medical professionals as we are on the same team working for the same goal, which is to help heal our patients and make a difference in the community we live in.ReferenceNibbelink, C. W., & Brewer, B. B. (2018). Decision-making in nursing practice: An integrative literature review. Journal of clinical nursing, 27(5-6), 917–928. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14151

STU Subjective Data Case Study

Description

icon Gastrointestinal & Endocrine

For this Discussion, you will take on the role of a clinician who is building a health history for one of the following cases. Your instructor will assign you your case number.

Case 1Case 2Case 3Chief Complaint
(CC) “I am here today due to frequent and watery bowel movements”“I have pain in my belly”“neck swelling”History of Present Illness (HPI)A 37-year-old European American female presents to your practice with “loose stools” for about three days. One event about every three hoursA 25-year-old female presents to the emergency room (ER) with complaints of severe abdominal pain for 2 weeks . The pain is sharp and crampy It hurts if I run, sit down hard, or if I have sexA 42-year-old African American female who refers that she has been noticing slow and progressive swelling on her neck for about a year. Also she stated she has lost weight without any food restrictionPMHNo contributory Patient deniesPatient denies PSHAppendectomy at the age of 14 Surgical removal of benign left breast nodule 2 years agoDrug Hx
No medsBirth controlNo medication at the timeAllergiesPenicillinNKANKASubjectiveFever and chills, Lost appetite Flatulence No mucus or blood on stoolsNausea and vomiting, Last menstrual period 5 days ago, New sexual partner about 2 months ago, No condoms, he hates them No pain, blood or difficulty with urinationMild difficult to shallow, Neck feels tight, Pt states she feels PalpitationsObjective Data PEB/P 188/96; Pulse 89; RR 16; Temp 99.0; Ht 5,6; wt 110; BMI 17.8B/P 138/90; temperature 99°F;  (RR) 20; (HR) 110, regular; oxygen saturation (PO2) 96%; pain 5/10 B/P 158/90; Pulse 102; RR 20; Temp 99.2; Ht 5,4; wt 114; BMI 19.6 Generalwell-developed female in no acute distress, appears slightly fatiguedacute distress and severe pain42-year-old female appears thin. She is anxious – pacing in the room and fidgeting, but in no acute distress. HEENTAtraumatic, normocephalic, PERRLA, EOMI, arcus senilus bilaterally, conjunctiva and sclera clear, nares patent, nasopharynx clear, edentulous.
Atraumatic, normocephalic, PERRLA, EOMI, conjunctiva and sclera clear; nares patent, nasopharynx clear, good dentition. Piercing in her right nostril and lower lip.
Bulging eyes NeckSuppleDiffuse enlargement of the thyroid glandLungsCTA AP&L
CTA AP&L
CTA AP&LCardS1S2 without rub or gallopS1S2 without rub or gallopS1S2 without rub, TachycardiaAbdpositive bowel sounds (BS) in all four quadrants; no masses; no organomegaly noted; diffuse, mild, bilateral lower quadrant pain noted Mild diffuse tenderness.

INSPECTION: no masses or thrills noted; no discoloration and skin is warm to; no tattoos or piercings; abdomen is nondistended and round
• AUSCULTATION: bowel sounds (BS) are normal in all four quadrants, no bruits noted
• PALPATION: on palpation, abdomen is tender to touch in four quadrants; tenderness noted on light palpation, deep palpation reveals no masses, spleen and liver unremarkable
• PERCUSSION: tympany heard in all quadrants, no dullness noted in abdominal area

benign, normoactive bowel sounds x 4GU Non contributory• EXTERNAL: mature hair distribution; no external lesions on labia
• INTROITUS: slight green-gray discharge, no lesions
• VAGINAL: normal rugae; moderate amount of green discharge on vaginal walls
• CERVIX: nulliparous os with small amount of purulent discharge from os with positive cervical motion tenderness (CMT)
• UTERUS: ante-flexed, normal size, shape, and position
• ADNEXA: bilateral tenderness with fullness; both ovaries without masses
• RECTAL: deferred
• VAGINAL DISCHARGE: green in color Non contributoryExtno cyanosis, clubbing or edemano cyanosis, clubbing or edemano cyanosis, clubbing or edemaIntegumentgood skin turgor noted, moist mucous membranesintact without lesions masses or rashesThin skin, Increase moistureNeuroNo obvious deformities, CN grossly intact II-XIINo obvious deficits and CN grossly intact II-XIINo obvious deficits and CN grossly intact II-XII

Once you received your case number, answer the following questions:

What other subjective data would you obtain?

What other objective findings would you look for?

What diagnostic exams do you want to order?

Name 3 differential diagnoses based on this patient presenting symptoms?

Give rationales for your each differential diagnosis.

Submission Instructions:

Your instructor will assign you your case number and you will post on the case number you have been assigned.

You will reply to the other two case studies (One of each).

Parenting Classes in A Womens Jail Essay

Description

I did 5 annotated bibliographies and the professor said I needed more info on what things are important, how they connect and to be clear regarding the study and conclusion. Can you help with these being better worded and more pertinent detail. We need to stay between 150-200 words, but will allow 225 words if need be, 

Directions and a sample from class.

Writing an Annotated Bibliography

What is it?

A list of citations of articles. Each citation is followed by a brief (usually about 150 words) descriptive and evaluative paragraph, the annotation. 

The purpose of the annotation is to inform the reader of the relevance, accuracy, and quality of the sources cited.  (https://guides.library.cornell.edu)

An annotated bibliography includes both summary and an evaluation of your source. 

Required elements:

The proper APA reference for your source. 

We are using APA 7th edition. 

  • A summary of the main arguments or main point of the source. 

What topics are covered? 

  • In other words, if you were to explain what the article was about to someone, what would you say? DO NOT USE PERSONAL PRONOUNS 
  • Assessment of the source. 

What is the purpose of this source and is the source a “good” source for the topic that the authors are writing about. 

Reflection regarding the source.

Once you’ve summarized and assessed a source, you need to ask how it fits into your research. Was this source helpful to you? How does it help you shape your argument? How can you use this source in your research project? Has it changed how you think about your topic? 

Example: 

  • There is an exemplar on Moodle, but here is another example with further details (details that I provide are in red)

Give the author credit, do not plagiarize and take ideas from the author without saying

No personal pronouns: I, me, we, etc. 

  • Hasker, W. (1992). Faith–learning integration: An overview. Christian Scholar’s Review, 21(3), 239-248. 

In this article, Hasker (1992) discusses the gap in the literature on Christian faith-learning integration. He notes that (By adding in “He notes that”, you give the author credit for his idea, instead of starting the sentence out as “The majority” which makes it sound like your idea.) the majority of literature on integration focuses on one of two perspectives: 1) the worldview perspective that explores the general, overarching challenges of integration; or, 2) from within academic disciplines that focus more narrowly on the challenges of integration within the particular disciplines. Hasker begins by offering a definition of faith-learning integration that underscores the importance of developing relationships between the Christian faith and human knowledge, while acknowledging the conceptual challenge that integration presents for a Christian worldview. After acknowledging the conceptual challenges of integration, Hasker argues that faith integration is necessary in learning due to the predominantly secular nature of academic settings. 

  • Hasker suggests utilizing the following three strategies for integration: 1) the compatibilist strategy that presupposes the integrity of both faith and academic discipline. This strategy focuses on shared assumptions rather than on challenging areas of conflict; 2) the transformationist strategy sees areas of conflict between faith and academic disciplines and works to transform the discipline to have more a Christian orientation; and 3) the reconstructionist strategy that finds fundamental tension between the assumptions of secular disciplines and the Christian faith. 

Hasker does an excellent job of discussing the complex challenges of faith integration in learning. (Here is your assessment).  He has keen insight into the assumptions of various approaches and provides the reader with a thoughtful critique of each approach, along with plenty of examples. Overall, Hasker provides a foundational article for understanding faith integration in learning and makes a compelling argument for more work to be done in this area (This last sentence is the reflection).

  • Keywords: faith, learning, education, religion, Christian integration, spiritual integration, 

Final Thoughts/Suggestions:

“Hasker implies” or “Hasker said” or “Hasker concluded”.  

New York University Gastrointestinal Function Case Study

Description

Gastrointestinal Function:

R.H. is a  74-year-old black woman, who presents to the family practice clinic for a  scheduled appointment. She complains of feeling bloated and constipated  for the past month, some-times going an entire week with only one bowel  movement. Until this episode, she has been very regular all of her  life, having a bowel movement every day or every other day. She reports  straining most of the time and it often takes her 10 minutes at a  minimum to initiate a bowel movement. Stools have been extremely hard.  She denies pain during straining. A recent colonoscopy was negative for  tumors or other lesions. She has not yet taken any medications to  provide relief for her constipation. Furthermore, she reports frequent  heartburn (3–4 times each week), most often occur-ring soon after  retiring to bed. She uses three pillows to keep herself in a more  upright position during sleep. On a friend’s advice, she purchased a  package of over-the-counter aluminum hydroxide tablets to help relieve  the heartburn. She has had some improvement since she began taking the  medicine. She reports using naproxen as needed for arthritic pain her  hands and knees. She states that her hands and knees are extremely stiff  when she rises in the morning. Because her arthritis has been getting  worse, she has stopped taking her daily walks and now gets very little  exercise.

Case Study Questions

In  your own words define constipation and name the risk factors that might  lead to develop constipation. List recommendations you would give to a  patient who is suffering from constipation. You might use a previous  experience you might have.

Based on the clinical manifestations  on R.H. case study, name and explain signs and symptoms presented that  are compatible with the constipation diagnosis. Complement your list  with signs and symptoms not present on the case study.

Sometimes  as an associate diagnosis and a complication, patients with  constipation could have anemia. Would you consider that possibility  based on the information provided on the case study?

Endocrine Function:
C.B.  is a significantly overweight, 48-year-old woman from the Winnebago  Indian tribe who had high blood sugar and cholesterol levels three years  ago but did not follow up with a clinical diagnostic work-up. She had  participated in the state’s annual health screening program and noticed  that her fasting blood sugar was 141 and her cholesterol was 225.  However, she felt “perfectly fine at the time” and could not afford any  more medications. Except for a number of “female infections,” she has  felt fine until recently. Today, she presents to the Indian Hospital  general practitioner complaining that her left foot has been weak and  numb for nearly three weeks and that the foot is difficult to flex. She  denies any other weakness or numbness at this time. However, she reports  that she has been very thirsty lately and gets up more often at night  to urinate. She has attributed these symptoms to the extremely warm  weather and drinking more water to keep hydrated. She has gained a total  of 65 pounds since her last pregnancy 14 years ago, 15 pounds in the  last 6 months alone.

Case Study Questions

  1. In  which race and ethnic groups is DM more prevalent? Based on C.B.  clinical manifestations, please compile the signs and symptoms that she  is exhibiting that are compatible with the Diabetes Mellitus Type 2  diagnosis.
  2. If C.B. develop a bacterial pneumonia on her right  lower lobe, how would you expect her Glycemia values to be? Explain and  support your answer.
  3. What would be the best initial therapy non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic to be recommended to C.B?

Anne Arundel Community College Nursing Essay

Description

Sleep disorders are conditions that result in changes in an individual’s pattern of sleep (Mayo Clinic, 2020). Not surprisingly, a sleep disorder can affect an individual’s overall health, safety, and quality of life. Psychiatric nurse practitioners can treat sleep disorders with psychopharmacologic treatments, however, many of these drugs can have negative effects on other aspects of a patient’s health and well-being. Additionally, while psychopharmacologic treatments may be able to address issues with sleep, they can also exert potential challenges with waking patterns. Thus, it is important for the psychiatric nurse practitioner to carefully evaluate the best psychopharmacologic treatments for patients that present with sleep/wake disorders.

Reference: Mayo Clinic. (2020). Sleep disorders. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/sle…

To prepare for this Assignment:

  • Review this week’s Learning Resources, including the Medication Resources indicated for this week.
  • Reflect on the psychopharmacologic treatments you might recommend for the assessment and treatment of patients with sleep/wake disorders.

The Assignment: 5 pages

Examine Case Study: Pharmacologic Approaches to the Treatment of Insomnia in a Younger Adult. You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the medication to prescribe to this patient. Be sure to consider factors that might impact the patient’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes.

At each decision point, you should evaluate all options before selecting your decision and moving throughout the exercise. Before you make your decision, make sure that you have researched each option and that you evaluate the decision that you will select. Be sure to research each option using the primary literature.

Introduction to the case (1 page)

  • Briefly explain and summarize the case for this Assignment. Be sure to include the specific patient factors that may impact your decision making when prescribing medication for this patient.

Decision #1 (1 page)

  • Which decision did you select?
  • Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
  • Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
  • What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
  • Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.

Decision #2 (1 page)

  • Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
  • Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
  • What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
  • Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.

Decision #3 (1 page)

  • Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
  • Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
  • What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
  • Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.

Conclusion (1 page)

  • Summarize your recommendations on the treatment options you selected for this patient. Be sure to justify your recommendations and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.

OU Drug Pricing Debate in the United States Senate Discussion

Description

Overview

This assignment will provide you with the opportunity to practice influencing policy by communicating with a legislator about a current health problem. The letter should be in block format for a business letter, the letter may be more than one page. You do need to support with evidence. Cite your sources and include a reference page at the end of your letter. Follow the assignment directions and review the rubric.

You can view samples for formatting a business letter on the following link:https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/subject_specific_writing/professional_technical_writing/basic_business_letters/sample_letters.html

Follow the steps below to write a letter advocating for change, go to for an example:

  1. Select a current health problem that is being debated at the national and/or state level (e.g., the proliferation of “pill mills”, pain clinics, etc) and state why it is of interest. Be sure to research your problem.
  2. Identify a legislator (state or federal) and state why that person is the appropriate one to contact, you will show why this is right person to contact based on the supporting data you provided in your letter.
  3. Draft a letter to the legislator in business block format including the proper salutation.
  4. Introduce yourself and your reason for writing.Include the following in the body of your letter:
  5. Introduce yourself and your reason for writing.
  6. State concisely what you understand to be the current socioeconomic, political, and ethical issues surrounding the problem. You must have supporting data (include citations).
  7. Discuss the implications of the problem for your community, nursing or nursing practice.
  8. Make a clear request for action. You must have supporting data (include citations).
  9. Request a response.
  10. Include a reference page beginning on the page following the end of the letter, also include citations in the body of your letter. At least three references are required.

Objectives

  • Explain how values and politics shape health policy.
  • Identify the components of political skill and the implications for nurses.

Points: 30

Due Date: Sat, April 23 by 8:00 a.m. Eastern Standard Time (EST) of the US.

References

Minimum of three (3) total references: one (1) reference from required course materials and two (2) peer-reviewed references. All references must be no older than five years (unless making a specific point using a seminal piece of information)

Peer-reviewed references include references from professional data bases such as PubMed or CINHAL applicable to population and practice area, along with evidence based clinical practice guidelines. Examples of unacceptable references are Wikipedia, UpToDate, Epocrates, Medscape, WebMD, hospital organizations, insurance recommendations, & secondary clinical databases.

Instructions

To be successful, complete the following steps in order:

STEP 1. Review the instructional materials and finish learning activities in this module.

STEP 2. Click here to download the rubric.

STEP 3. Create a new Word document, write your paper based on the above overview.

STEP 4. Refer to APA book and rubric for correctly formatting the paper.

STEP 5. Save the document with the filename: “Lastname_Firstname_Module_5_Assessment_10” (Example: Smith_Jill_Module_5_Assessment_10.docx)

STEP 6. Submit the document by clicking the link on the left titled “M5 A10 WA: SUBMISSION AREA – INFLUENCING POLICY”

Note: You will have three (3) attempts to submit a written assignment, only the final attempt will be graded. For each attempt you will receive a SafeAssign originality report. This will give you a chance to correct the assignment based on the SafeAssign score. Click here to view instructions on how to interpret your SafeAssign originality report.

Kindly note: If a submission has been made for more than 48 hours without a re-submission, it will be considered final and will be subject to being graded.

Got questions? Please post them to the ‘QUESTION & ANSWER FORUM’ in Blackboard.

R.H Case Study

Description

Gastrointestinal Function:
R.H. is a 74-year-old black woman, who presents to the family practice clinic for a scheduled appointment. She complains of feeling bloated and constipated for the past month, some-times going an entire week with only one bowel movement. Until this episode, she has been very regular all of her life, having a bowel movement every day or every other day. She reports straining most of the time and it often takes her 10 minutes at a minimum to initiate a bowel movement. Stools have been extremely hard. She denies pain during straining. A recent colonoscopy was negative for tumors or other lesions. She has not yet taken any medications to provide relief for her constipation. Furthermore, she reports frequent heartburn (3–4 times each week), most often occur-ring soon after retiring to bed. She uses three pillows to keep herself in a more upright position during sleep. On a friend’s advice, she purchased a package of over-the-counter aluminum hydroxide tablets to help relieve the heartburn. She has had some improvement since she began taking the medicine. She reports using naproxen as needed for arthritic pain her hands and knees. She states that her hands and knees are extremely stiff when she rises in the morning. Because her arthritis has been getting worse, she has stopped taking her daily walks and now gets very little exercise.

Case Study Questions

  1. In your own words define constipation and name the risk factors that might lead to develop constipation. List recommendations you would give to a patient who is suffering from constipation. You might use a previous experience you might have.
  2. Based on the clinical manifestations on R.H. case study, name and explain signs and symptoms presented that are compatible with the constipation diagnosis. Complement your list with signs and symptoms not present on the case study.
  3. Sometimes as an associate diagnosis and a complication, patients with constipation could have anemia. Would you consider that possibility based on the information provided on the case study?

Endocrine Function:
C.B. is a significantly overweight, 48-year-old woman from the Winnebago Indian tribe who had high blood sugar and cholesterol levels three years ago but did not follow up with a clinical diagnostic work-up. She had participated in the state’s annual health screening program and noticed that her fasting blood sugar was 141 and her cholesterol was 225. However, she felt “perfectly fine at the time” and could not afford any more medications. Except for a number of “female infections,” she has felt fine until recently. Today, she presents to the Indian Hospital general practitioner complaining that her left foot has been weak and numb for nearly three weeks and that the foot is difficult to flex. She denies any other weakness or numbness at this time. However, she reports that she has been very thirsty lately and gets up more often at night to urinate. She has attributed these symptoms to the extremely warm weather and drinking more water to keep hydrated. She has gained a total of 65 pounds since her last pregnancy 14 years ago, 15 pounds in the last 6 months alone.

Case Study Questions

  1. In which race and ethnic groups is DM more prevalent? Based on C.B. clinical manifestations, please compile the signs and symptoms that she is exhibiting that are compatible with the Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 diagnosis.
  2. If C.B. develop a bacterial pneumonia on her right lower lobe, how would you expect her Glycemia values to be? Explain and support your answer.
  3. What would be the best initial therapy non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic to be recommended to C.B?