I’m working on a english writing question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

Read the following reviews of Parable of the Sower:

102 POTS review Science Fiction – The New York Times 1994.pdf Download 102 POTS review Science Fiction – The New York Times 1994.pdf

102 Gloria Steinem POTS review 2016.pdf Download 102 Gloria Steinem POTS review 2016.pdf

102 new yorker POTS review 2017.pdf Download 102 new yorker POTS review 2017.pdf

Discuss one way in which you agree with each review (thoroughly explain why you agree) and one way in which you disagree with each review (again, with thorough explanation of why).

For each review say why you agree and disagree so around three to four sentences per review

The text discusses “Theoretical Perspectives in Sociology” in Chapter 2. As a student, you sociologically view the world in a particular way. Do you see society as a system where all the various parts work together to keep the system functioning smoothly (structural functionalism), or do you see society as a place where various groups are struggling for power and influence in competition with other groups (conflict theory)? Perhaps you see the world primarily as a place that is about relationships between people and how people understand each other and understand what is expected of them in different situations (symbolic interactionism).

Write an essay that addresses the following:

Explain the three ways to view the world “sociologically.”

Identify which sociological perspective (structural functionalism, conflict theory, or symbolic interactionism) most closely represents your view of the world.

1. Describe the factors that have caused you to view the world through that perspective, such as personal experience in our society, popular culture, media, etc.
2. Use an example from world events that demonstrates evidence of your theory.
3. Briefly explain why you did not choose each of the other two perspectives being careful to demonstrate that you understand the other perspectives.

I’m working on a social science writing question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

Please respond to peer

A competent person is a person that is knowledgeable in safety standards, capable of identifying existing and predictable hazards, is trained in safe work practices, certified to train others, and has the authorization to take corrective measures. A competent person can be a member of leadership, like a supervisor that understands the job and knows how to accomplish the tasks of the workers in a safe manner. This person is necessary at all worksites to conduct safety meetings/stand downs, report/ investigate incidents, provide PPE, and ensure that tasks are completed safely and in compliance with OSHA rules and regs. 

A safety professional is a person with extensive knowledge, training and/or experience with an educational background. This individual overlooks the entire organizations operations by providing advice, support, and develop strategies to lead the organizations safety and health management program. Although, it would be beneficial to have a safety professional at every construction worksite. This might not be feasible since a safety professional might be involved with multiple company projects at once. 

3.5 Discussion Forum: Race in the Twenty-First Century (GRADED DISCUSSION)

After watching the film clip “Race: The Power of an Illusion,” use one concept from Chapter 1 of the Desmond & Emirbayer to discuss the journey of race formation in the USA.

Think about all the aspects of your identity, other than your race and ethnicity, such as your gender, religion, nationality. What part of your identity is most salient to you? Explore, in a reflexive fashion, why this is, paying close attention to how your multiple identities intersect with one another. 

Consider the list of conditions of White Privilege created by Peggy McIntosh. Which privilege surprised you the most? Explain.

Continuing with White Privilege by McIntosh, pick one privilege you have benefitted from, regardless of your race/ethnicity, and analyze critically. 

What does intersectionality mean to you? Can you think of ways in which you do not identify with some members of your race (or ethnicity, gender, religion, etc.) because of another aspect of your identity? For example, perhaps many members of your racial group fail to tolerate your religious preference, or maybe, some members of your gender just do not understand your sexual orientation.

1) What was the “Trail of Broken Treaties”? What happened during the occupation, and what demands were made? How did the occupation conclude?

2) According to the documentary, what historical events led up to the Occupation of Wounded Knee?

3) Alternatively, what led to the ending of the Occupation of Wounded Knee, according to the documentary?

4) According to the documentary and the article, what is the historical significance/symbolism of the location in which the Occupation of Wounded Knee took place?

5) According to the documentary, what were the protesters at Wounded Knee hoping to achieve through the Occupation? What were the lasting effects?

6) According to the article, why is Wounded Knee considered a “forgotten Civil Rights movement”?

7) Lastly, please share your thoughts and reactions to both this week’s and last week’s discussions on the Occupations of Alcatraz and Wounded Knee, and the American Indian Civil Rights movement overall.

LINKS:

The Trail of Broken Treaties: A March on Washington D.C. 1972Links to an external site.

We Shall Remain: Wounded KneeLinks to an external site.

Occupy Wounded Knee: A 71 Day Siege and a Forgotten Civil Rights MovementLinks to an external site.