I’m working on a history multi-part question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

Reading: “Wonder-making and philosophical wonder” by Tybjerg (available on Blackboard)

Instructions: Read the assigned text through carefully. The following questions are meant tohelp focus your attention as you wade through the academic language. We will be discussingthese questions together in class, so give them a bit of thought.

1) What is Tybjerg’s argument in this article, and what evidence does she use to support it?Who is Heron, whom Tybjerg mentions a lot in this article?

2) How does the inclusion of wonder-making devices, and the philosophical principle ofwonder in general, bring Heron’s mechanics from the practical to the theoretical?

3) How does the epistemology of the “knower” and the “unknowing” come into play inHeron’s mechanics? (See page 451.)

4) How might Heron have argued that mechanical displays were more useful thanphilosophical debates or arguments?

Evaluate the following websites for their credibility, bias and legitimacy. Which sites do you think promote a potential political agenda or ideological bias, and which ones promote a more empirical, objective agenda? Which ones do you think would be more legitimately used in a research project like yours? pick 3 my research project is based on covid & mRna

* Make sure to do outside research on the organizations represented by looking them up via Google and Wikipedia *

Provide specific evidence and examples from the websites to support your responses. Your responses should be at least 300-500 word. You should also respond to at least one other students by agreeing or disagreeing with their evaluations.

Websites:

https://www.heritage.org

http://www.globalwarming.org

https://www.nejm.org

https://www.brookings.edu

https://www.nmanet.org (Links to an external site.)

https://www.aclu.org (Links to an external site.)

https://home.nra.org (Links to an external site.)

https://www.cato.org

I’m working on a anthropology discussion question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

1. Go to the Smithsonian website and look at their 3D collection of hominid skulls. It doesn’t require adobe flash player. Click on the pictures of each hominid and then you can click on the pictures and it will turn like a 3D model.
   https://3d.si.edu/collections/hominin-fossils
2. The questions are:
   1. Which parts of skull identification did you find easy (make sure to say which skull with Genus and species and use skull terminology such as brain capacity, brow ridges, mandibles, sagital crest, zygomatics and/or facial prognathism )?
   2. Which parts of identification did you find difficult, for example a feature that doesn’t exist in modern humans (make sure to say which skull with Genus and species and use skull terminology)?
   3. What insights have you gained with regards to the work of paleoanthropologists with minimal hominid fossils to classify new species?

Please use this prompt when writing your essay  

Throughout this course, we have examined western civilization’s tendency to broaden individual rights.  This trend has produced modern western societies with more robust political and economic freedom when compared to Europe in 1200 A.D. 

However, commentators like David Brooks of the NYT express concern that western society’s focus on expanding individual freedom has yielded unintended consequences that manifest in a deterioration of social cohesion.  For example, Brooks notes that western society increasingly suffers from: sharp increases in people reporting loneliness, depression, and in rising suicide rates.  Moreover, Brooks laments that many western nations are experiencing a decline in marriage rates and falling trust in institutions.

Is Brooks right to attribute these statistics to the excesses of western individualism?  Why or why not?

Here is a link to a talk Brooks gave at Davidson College where he made some of the arguments I’m referencing:

https://m.facebook.com/watch/?v=10156123122347052&_rdr

Requirements:

– 2 papers. First paper us template #1 as the writing structure, second paper use template #3 as the writing structure.

– Stick with #13 Energy to write these 2 papers

– First paper: Template 1: Write about your landscape’s energy use and areas of potential improvement. (Use template #1, 300 words in total)

– Second paper: Template 3: Write an action plan for reducing your property’s energy use. (Use template #3, 300 words in total)

Writing Objectives:

? Be able to list all the renewable energies available in urban areas.

? Be articulate the differences between passive and active energies.

? Be able to discuss the importance of ERoEIs.

The second paper might be tricky because it involved design, but don’t worry, just stick with the strategies from the #13 Energy reading. I’ll make adjustments based on your draft. Let me know if there is any questions, I’ll get back to you ASAP!