I’m working on a psychology exercise and need support to help me learn.

Prejudice is a serious problem in our society. Jane Elliott is one of the leading advocates for honest conversation regarding racism and inequity of power. She engages in thought-provoking (and often anger inducing) conversation to help us think, learn and grow.

watch a segment with Jane Elliott at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebPoSMULI5U and read an article featuring Jane Elliott at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268053404_Divided_by_Gender_An_Interview_with_Jane_Elliott

type up a 1-page reaction to the movie/article. In this reaction, I want to know what you think about what Ms. Elliott presents and explain if you agree or disagree. Support your answer. I then want at least one paragraph explaining how you will identify and address your own subtle prejudices.

Watch the Vice News documentary titled “The Crystal Meth Epidemic Plaguing 

Fresno”. Pay close attention to the individuals from the valley that find themselves at the 

heart of the debate (both “good“ and “bad”). After you have completed this meaningful 

screening, ask yourself and answer the following questions; Who are these involved 

citizens? (i.e. Dr. Lasher, Dallas Blanchard, Det. Pennal, Deputy Baylon, Drug Dealer, 

Pastor Juan, etc.) What walks of life do they view the issue from? (i.e. occupation, 

socio-economic status, religion, etc.) What are your thoughts about Proposition 47 

mentioned in the film? Where do you think the debate will navigate into the future? (ex: 

going after the supply or demand side, cartels as terrorist organizations, etc.) Do you 

think the film is fair/unfair in its characterization of Fresno as the Meth capital of the 

nation? Include data figures/outside sources to strengthen your argument 

Over the past 4 weeks, you have developed most of the required components of your grant proposal. In this assignment, you develop the remaining components, revise and finalize previously created components, and compile your final grant proposal. Ensure that your grant proposal includes all of the components in the Grant Proposal Assignment Guide, as well as any additional components required by the application of the funding source you have selected.

Note: Once compiled, your entire grant proposal should total 3,000–4,000 words.

Complete the remaining components of your grant proposal. It is recommended that you develop the following this week:

• Cover Letter
• Executive Summary
• Evaluation
• Sustainability
• Conclusion
• Any other components not yet completed

Compile all grant components in the following order:

• Cover Letter
• Introduction
• Executive Summary
• Organization Background
• Problem Statement
• Goals and Objectives
• Strategies/Project Management Plan
• Budget
• Budget Narrative
• Grant-Specific Items
• Evaluation
• Sustainability
• Conclusion
• Appendices (if needed)

Format any references according to APA guidelines.

I’m working on a psychology question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

Questions:1. Provide an explanation of the conveyer belt phenomenon as illustrated through the Holsteiner al (2016) chapters. Include in your explanation what you have learned about• the power imbalances between athletes and decision-makers at the youth, college,and pro levels that shape the pipeline of experiences of pro athletes (i.e., explaininfantilization)• how those power imbalances culminate in the issues around athletes’ transition outof sport (i.e., explain anomie and other transition/retirement issues)*300 word minimum2. Explain the finance structures in professional sport and enrichment through franchiseownership. In other words, explain how owners build and sustain their wealth around a profranchise.• Include in your explanation the tax and structural benefits (i.e., monopolistic, monopsonistic, and cartel-like set up of U.S. pro s 

Based on the principles of design you learned, you’ll find two pieces of visual content — this can be a sign, a poster, an ad (digital is OK!), a billboard, a brochure, a book cover, a painting, etc. You’ll find something you like and something you don’t like. For each piece:

Include a picture or screenshot of the visual piece.

Briefly summarize what the piece is and where you saw it.

• Explain what you liked or didn’t like about the piece. Try to explain it in terms of design principles. For example, “the colors are pleasing” or “this layout was confusing and I didn’t know where to start” or “the type was easy to read and felt appropriate to the audience”. 
• You’ll write a summary for the piece you liked and the piece you didn’t like.