Two page summary of research article with work cited APA

(b) Background or literature survey or related work of research article

(c) Solution statement or proposed work mentioned in the research article.

(d) Results and discussion mentioned in the research article.

(e) Conclusion and most important reference numbers mentioned in the research article.

Rubric research paper:

·individual project report as per given guidelines including specification of hardware and software used in this project.

(Font: Times New Roman, Font size: 12, single line inter-line spacing, page-setup: 1in all sides. Also, you have to include front page as per given guidelines).

5 PowerPoint slides:

You need to cover following points in ppt

1. Problem statements of the research article.

2. Solution statement or proposed work the research article

References and citations should be included in the latest APA

Please write on one of the following prompts, explaining the reasoning succinctly and clearly in your own words. Your discussion should be about 300 words. It is due by midnight April 17.

In such a short paper, keeping your discussion focused is important. Quoting the text is not necessary, and will likely take away space you need to fully explain your points.   Because the assignment is so short, you won’t have space to explain everything. So concentrate on explaining the most central points. 

1. Start by explaining what the learner’s paradox is, and what is paradoxical about it. Then, as clearly as you can, explain Socrates’ solution to it, and his reasoning for this solution. Very briefly indicate a reason to think it works, or a reason to think it fails. 

Please conduct a generous exploratory critique and assessment of your primary text (Levi-Strauss, Sontag, or Cole) in the context of ancillary sources and your own reflections. In addition to “deepening” (exploring and explaining what troubles and excites you in the evidence) you are also practicing your role as a high-minded critic who is “reckoning” with some extraordinary conceptual claim, or some borderline you see your author crossing, or some lacuna in the text. As the critic your essaying must bring your primary text into new contexts and/or dialectical conversations and make clear, at each step of the way, how the new contexts or conversation partners complicate, revitalize, clarify and/or raise new questions about the remarkable idea your primary author explores—and the way he/she explores and expresses it.

I’m working on a english writing question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

The reading is the article on net neutrality. It goes into some details, but I encourage you to find other sources to augment this before you post. Here is a clip from John Oliver’s show that is funny but makes some good points. You can also just search net neutrality to get more info about it. Feel free to write about your own experiences with internet access and whether or not you think it is important for everyone to have access, especially in the days of Covid.

https://www.wired.com/story/guide-net-neutrality/ (Links to an external site.)

Specific Directions:

Please read each of these and rank them according to the following criteria:

• Addresses appropriate audience
• Addresses audience’ needs
• Provides appropriate level of data necessary for audience to understand the topic
• Integrates graphics smoothly into text
• Uses graphics that illustrate/reinforces the text
• Uses design elements to make it easy for the reader to navigate the report.

Submission Guidelines:

1. Use memo format addressed to me

2. Use a purpose statement that reflects the memo’s content

3 Organize according to which report you find strongest, then the next strongest, and then the next strongest

4. Use the report writer’s name as a heading

5. Under the writer’s name, provide a paragraph that justifies your ranking of this report.

6. Follow suit with the next two reports

7. End with a standard conclusion that also evaluates the usefulness of this assignment to you.