Answer the questions below according to the prompts.? To answer the questions, review the reflections you’ve written as you’ve worked through the subject?and the learning materials.??  

1. Identify one of the elements from the OneMore      scenario that calls for resilience.
2. Apply the Gibb’s      Reflective Cycle – Description, Feelings,      Evaluation, Analysis, Conclusion and Action plan – as a      structure to learn from this experience and demonstrate your understanding      of strategies you can employ to improve your professional      responses.?
3. Imagine you are interviewing for a job at a new      company. Respond to a question asking you to demonstrate your resilience      by referring to your experience in the OneMore scenario.?Structure your      answer using the?STAR (Situation, Task, Action, Result)Links to an external site.?technique.https://careersblog.uts.edu.au/be-the-star-of-any-interview-how-to-ace-the-star-technique/

I’m working on a writing project and need a sample draft to help me learn.

Example:

• Provide a short summary: what, when, where and what was discussed

• Who attended:
• What: RMF Lifeboat, presentation given by Dennis K. Moore and Boykin B. Jordan
• When: Saturday September 18, 10:00 to 11:45 am
• Format: Online
• Title: “Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification – CMCC Readiness – Is Your Business Prepared”
• Content: The 2 gentlemen who are registered CMMC consultants talked abut the assessment process and what a business needs to think about when beginning to look at it at least 6 months before the formal assessment. Required for all DoD contractors now but likely will be expanded to all businesses doing business with the Federal government.
• How found out: Email notification as I am a member of the group

Please conduct a generous exploratory critique and assessment of your primary text (Levi-Strauss, Sontag, or Cole) in the context of ancillary sources and your own reflections. In addition to “deepening” (exploring and explaining what troubles and excites you in the evidence) you are also practicing your role as a high-minded critic who is “reckoning” with some extraordinary conceptual claim, or some borderline you see your author crossing, or some lacuna in the text. As the critic your essaying must bring your primary text into new contexts and/or dialectical conversations and make clear, at each step of the way, how the new contexts or conversation partners complicate, revitalize, clarify and/or raise new questions about the remarkable idea your primary author explores—and the way he/she explores and expresses it.

I’m working on a english writing question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

The reading is the article on net neutrality. It goes into some details, but I encourage you to find other sources to augment this before you post. Here is a clip from John Oliver’s show that is funny but makes some good points. You can also just search net neutrality to get more info about it. Feel free to write about your own experiences with internet access and whether or not you think it is important for everyone to have access, especially in the days of Covid.

https://www.wired.com/story/guide-net-neutrality/ (Links to an external site.)

Specific Directions:

Please read each of these and rank them according to the following criteria:

• Addresses appropriate audience
• Addresses audience’ needs
• Provides appropriate level of data necessary for audience to understand the topic
• Integrates graphics smoothly into text
• Uses graphics that illustrate/reinforces the text
• Uses design elements to make it easy for the reader to navigate the report.

Submission Guidelines:

1. Use memo format addressed to me

2. Use a purpose statement that reflects the memo’s content

3 Organize according to which report you find strongest, then the next strongest, and then the next strongest

4. Use the report writer’s name as a heading

5. Under the writer’s name, provide a paragraph that justifies your ranking of this report.

6. Follow suit with the next two reports

7. End with a standard conclusion that also evaluates the usefulness of this assignment to you.